It is no exaggeration to say that the market is currently . In the midsize segment alone, there are 22 different SUVs you can buy for the 2023 model year.
With so many options, it’s only natural that even some good SUVs are ranked below the best in professional ratings. However, a midsize SUV scores significantly lower than all of its peers.
says the Toyota 4Runner is the least attractive midsize SUV, several leagues behind the Nissan Murano. The Murano was also tied with the Chevy Blazer and GMC Arcadia, while the Toyota Highlander ranked a little higher on the list. Top-of-the-table finishes are more competitive, with five models tied for third place.
The Kia Telluride and are reportedly the best midsize SUVs to buy this year. The Telluride consistently impresses consumers with its performance and interior accommodations, while the Palisade offers the greatest value. Both of these options cost thousands of dollars less than the 4Runner and get significantly better gas mileage.
The Worst Midsize SUV of 2023 still has a respectable score
Even though it’s ranked the worst midsize SUV of 2023, the 4Runner still has plenty of appeal for drivers who crave rugged performance. Critics say it’s a great off-road SUV, especially when equipped with all-wheel drive. Its departure and approach angles are 26 inches and 33 inches, respectively, plus it has about 9.6 inches of ground clearance.
Even the rear-wheel drive model still has some off-road potential thanks to its two-speed transfer case. The Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro can handle rock crawling and other intense adventures with its lockable rear differential and low speed crawl control. This model also features lowering suspension springs and Fox shock absorbers.
Aside from these last two features, the TRD Off-Road has the same equipment at . You can also get this set-up with adjustable air suspension, while the TRD Off-Road Premium has an optional terrain monitoring camera.
Critics also praise the Toyota 4Runner for standard equipment on the starting trim. The SR5 has nearly every advanced driver safety feature available, minus an additional parking camera and parking sensors. The infotainment system is reportedly basic but functional, plus it includes smartphone integration with Amazon Alexa compatibility.
The two-row Toyota 4Runner has the most total cargo space, nearly 90 cubic feet with the second row folded. Over 47 cubic feet of storage area can be utilized behind the rear seats. Edmunds also says you can easily fit a few sleeping bags inside the 4Runner with the seats folded down.
Even the Toyota 4Runner’s low points please some drivers
The impressive off-road performance of the Toyota 4Runner would not be possible without its 270hp V6. However, critics tend to loathe the broadcast for its slow response times and heavy input requirements. The engine itself also sometimes lacks adequate acceleration, potentially making daily driving a chore.
Another thing that spoils it is its poor ride quality. Its heavy curb weight causes excessive body lean when cornering, and most critics agree that the steering lacks feedback.
Oddly enough, the 4Runner’s fuel economy numbers are actually lower than some pickups. Regardless of transmission, it gets just 17 combined city/highway mpg.
The interior also lacks much of the plush padding and glossy interior surfaces that are common in so many rivals. If you primarily use your Toyota 4Runner off-road travel, perhaps the thirsty powertrain and basic accommodations won’t bother you. Otherwise, US News has a whole list of better options.
